Philip Selznick (1919–2010) was one of the preeminent sociologists of his time. He is widely recognized for his major contributions to a number of fields, including general sociology, sociology of organizations, industrial sociology, sociology of law, and moral sociology. He was a Professor of Sociology (and later a Professor of Law and Sociology) at the University of California, Berkeley from 1952 until his (notional) retirement in 1984. He founded the Center for the Study of Law and Society (in 1961) and the Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program (in 1978), both at UC Berkeley. The Law and Society Center and the JSP Program are still thriving. Over the years they have brought legions of students and scholars from all over the world to Berkeley, and then sent them in turn to many of the world’s great universities.



Selznick published his first book, TVA and the Grass Roots, in 1949; his last book, A Humanist Science, appeared in 2008. In between he wrote The Organizational Weapon (1952); Leadership in Administration (1957); Law, Society, and Industrial Justice (1969); Law and Society in Transition (1978, with Philippe Nonet); The Moral Commonwealth (1992), which he considered his magnum opus; and The Communitarian Persuasion (2002). These books, and the numerous contributions he published in edited volumes and academic journals, reflect the exceptionally broad scope of his interests. His intellectual strength also stands out in Sociology, the textbook he wrote together with Leonard Broom. This textbook came out in 1955 and went through seven editions, the last one published in 1981. For some thirty years, it was the best sold sociology textbook, not just in the United States but worldwide.



In the ten chapters of The Anthem Companion to Philip Selznick, three recurrent themes stand out. First, in all chapters much attention is devoted to Selznick’s impressive professional and intellectual range and to his lasting influence in a number of major fields of sociology. Second, throughout these ten chapters, the question recurs whether Selznick markedly changed his sociological or political perspectives in the course of his career, or whether there is a basic continuity and coherence in his preoccupations and convictions throughout his life. Third, while in the first chapter Selznick’s intellectual predisposition is linked to the particular circumstances of his younger years and student days, and in the last chapter it is argued that Selznick’s distinctive intellectual perspective can best be ascribed to his “ecumenical sensibility,” all the chapters in between make substantive contributions to revealing the importance of the humanist impulse underlying Selznick’s sociology.





In order to capture the spirit of this towering sociologist, this man of all seasons, the book devotes one of the chapters to a historical symposium, in which Selznick himself responds to critics of his magnum opus, The Moral Commonwealth. The other nine chapters of this volume have a different background. They embody the legacy of Selznick’s humanist science. They come from different corners of the academic world: sociology, organization studies, law, political science, philosophy. But they all cross disciplinary boundaries, bridge disciplinary divides, and display an awareness of and respect for Selznick’s humanist sensibility. Selznick would have felt very comfortable in this company. In that sense, all the chapters of The Anthem Companion to Philip Selznick are true companions to Selznick’s sociology.