For some time now, the European Court of Human Rights is under substantial pressure. From a case overload crisis it stumbled into a legitimacy crisis with regard to certain countries. This should be taken seriously, since scholars warn that institutions with eroding legitimacy risk demise or reform. The goal of this volume is to explore how widespread this critical attitude of the European Court of Human Rights really is. It also assesses to what extent such criticism is being translated in strategies at the political level or at the judicial level and brings about concrete changes in the dynamics between national and European fundamental rights protection. The book is topical and innovative, as these questions have so far remained largely unexplored, especially cross-nationally.Far from focusing exclusively on those voices that are currently raised so loud, conclusions are based on comparative in-depth reports, covering fifteen Contracting Parties and the EU.

Contributions by: Patricia Popelier, Koen Lemmens, Sarah Lambrecht, Clara Rauchegger, Anna Gamper, Patricia Popelier, L'ubomír Majercik, Katharina Pabel, Giuseppe Martinico, Krystyna Kowalik Banczyk, Henrik Wenander, Katarzyna Blay-Grabarczyk, Eszter Polgari, Janneke H. Gerards, Michael Reiertsen, Tilmann Altwicker, Olgun Akbulut, Roger Mastermann, Armen Mazmanyan, Aaron Matta