SULJE VALIKKO

avaa valikko

Are the Humanities Inconsequent? - Interpreting Marx's Riddle of the Dog
16,20 €
Prickly Paradigm Press, LLC
Sivumäärä: 113 sivua
Asu: Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Julkaisuvuosi: 2009, 30.05.2009 (lisätietoa)
Kieli: Englanti
Adapting the discontinuous and multitonal critical procedures of works like Carlyle's "Sartor Resartus" and Laura Riding's "Anarchism Is Not Enough", in this pamphlet Jerome McGann subjects current literary studies to a patacritical investigation. The investigation centers on the interpretation of a notorious modern riddle: 'Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read'. Working by indirection and from multiple points of view, the book argues that aesthetics is always a science of exceptions, and that any given critical practice is also always an exception from itself. The book works from two assumptions: first, that the riddle of the dog conceals an allegory about book culture and is addressed to the academic custodians of book culture; and second, that any explanation of the riddle is necessarily implicated in the problem posed by the riddle. It therefore remains to be seen - it is the reader's part to decide - whether the book is a friend to man or - perhaps like the riddle of the dog - 'too dark to read'.

Tuotetta lisätty
ostoskoriin kpl
Siirry koriin
LISÄÄ OSTOSKORIIN
Kirjan painos kustantajalta loppu. Mahdollisesta uudesta painoksesta ei vielä tietoa. Seuraa saatavuutta.
Myymäläsaatavuus
Helsinki
Tapiola
Turku
Tampere
Are the Humanities Inconsequent? - Interpreting Marx's Riddle of the Dogzoom
Näytä kaikki tuotetiedot
Sisäänkirjautuminen
Kirjaudu sisään
Rekisteröityminen
Oma tili
Omat tiedot
Omat tilaukset
Omat laskut
Lisätietoja
Asiakaspalvelu
Tietoa verkkokaupasta
Toimitusehdot
Tietosuojaseloste