When debating upon how to react to new styles of warfare in the 21st
century, scholars and political leaders often invoke the language of the just
war doctrine. However, while terms such as "last resort" and "legitimate authority"
are frequently used, their meaning is often vague or improperly used.
In what ways can we make the terminology of just war more concrete and
meaningful? This study examines the philosophical structure of the just war
tradition, in particular focusing on its origins. Through an analysis of the
ontological presuppositions of Augustine's arguments on just war, this study
explains some of the fundamental assumptions necessary for the just war
doctrine to remain coherent. By investigating contemporary attempts to
address morality in warfare, this study also explains why major schools of
thought (realism, international law, liberalism) fail in this endevour. This book
will be of use to scholars of political theory, international relations, and
intellectual history. It will also prove useful to researchers who focus political
theology, ethics in warfare, and conflict studies.