This book explores the regulations, goals and functioning of preparatory proceedings in four Nordic countries and eight former communist countries. The contributions discuss whether, and how the regulation and practice of preparatory proceedings enhance swift civil justice that is both inexpensive and has quality outcomes. A central question is whether the main hearing model of civil justice, in which preclusion of new evidence and claims occur at the end of the preparatory stage, results in greater efficiency, or whether the functioning of civil proceedings largely depends on other factors. It also
examines regulation and use of court-connected mediation and judicial
settlement efforts. This book offers comparative insights into the functioning
of the preparatory civil proceedings in the countries covered.

Preparatory proceedings are considered a key tool for achieving efficient civil
proceedings. The claims and factual background of the case are clarified at an
earlystage, and the main hearing is focused. Judicial settlement efforts and
court-connected mediation contribute to early resolution of cases, and are
important elements of Nordic civil procedure The Nordic countries have used the
main hearing model of civil proceedings for some decades, and recent reforms
have further enhanced the role of the preparatory stage. Former communist
countries are reforming their earlier piecemeal- format civil proceedings by
introducing and strengthening written and oral preparation, as well as court-connected mediation.