Yongxian Zhang (ed.); Thomas Goebel (ed.); Zhigang Peng (ed.); Charles A. Williams (ed.); Mark Yoder (ed.); John B. Rundle Birkhäuser (2018) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Zhongliang Wu (ed.); Yongxian Zhang (ed.); Thomas H.W. Goebel (ed.); Qinghua Huang (ed.); Charles A. Williams (ed.); Xing Birkhäuser (2022) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Between 1898 and 1918, many American states introduced the initiative, referendum, and recall - known collectively as direct democracy. Most interpreters have seen the motives for these reform measures as purely political, but Thomas Goebel demonstrates that the call for direct democracy was deeply rooted in antimonopoly sentiment. Frustrated with the governmental corruption and favoritism that facilitated the rise of monopolies, advocates of direct democracy aimed to check the influence of legislative bodies and directly empower the people to pass laws and abolish trusts. But direct democracy failed to achieve its promises: corporations and trusts continued to flourish, voter turnout rates did not increase, and interest groups grew stronger. By the 1930s, it was clear that direct democracy favored large organizations with the financial and organizational resources to fund increasingly expensive campaigns. Recent years have witnessed a resurgence of direct democracy, particularly in California, where ballot questions and propositions have addressed such volatile issues as gay rights and affirmative action. In this context, Goebel's analysis of direct democracy's history, evolution, and ultimate unsuitability as a grassroots tool is particularly timely.
