Michaela Banzhaf; Isabella Maurer; Tiziana Miceli; Stephanie Nonn; Martin Stenzenberger; Antonio Bentivoglio; V Bernhofer Buchner, C.C. Verlag (2015) Kovakantinen kirja
Michaela Banzhaf; Isabella Maurer; Tiziana Miceli; Stephanie Nonn; Martin Stenzenberger; Antonio Bentivoglio; V Bernhofer Buchner, C.C. Verlag (2015) Kovakantinen kirja
Michaela Banzhaf; Isabella Maurer; Stephanie Nonn; Martin Stenzenberger; Antonio Bentivoglio; Paola Bernabei; V Bernhofer Buchner, C.C. Verlag (2016) Kovakantinen kirja
Michaela Banzhaf; Isabella Maurer; Stephanie Nonn; Martin Stenzenberger; Antonio Bentivoglio; Paola Bernabei; V Bernhofer Buchner, C.C. Verlag (2016) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Michaela Banzhaf; Isabella Maurer; Stephanie Nonn; Martin Stenzenberger; Antonio Bentivoglio; Paola Bernabei; V Bernhofer Buchner, C.C. Verlag (2016) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Michaela Banzhaf; Isabella Maurer; Stephanie Nonn; Martin Stenzenberger; Antonio Bentivoglio; Paola Bernabei; V Bernhofer Buchner, C.C. Verlag (2016) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Michaela Banzhaf; Ingrid Ickler; Isabella Maurer; Martin Stenzenberger; Antonio Bentivoglio; Paola Bernabei; Ve Bernhofer Buchner, C.C. Verlag (2017) Kovakantinen kirja
Anne-Rose Fischer; Ingrid Ickler; Isabella Maurer; Martin Stenzenberger; Michaela Banzhaf; Antonio Bentivoglio; Bernabei Buchner, C.C. Verlag (2018) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Supply relations are often governed by so-called relational contracts. These are informal agreements sustained by the value of future cooperation. Although relational contracts persist in practice, research on these types of contract is only emerging in Operations and Supply Chain Management. This book studies a two-firm supply chain, where repeated transactions via well-established supply contracts and continued quality-improvement efforts are governed by a relational contract. We are able to characterize an optimal relational contract, i.e., to develop policies for supplier and buyer that structure investments in quality and flexibility in a way that no other self-enforcing contract generates higher expected joint surplus. A second goal is to compare the performance of different returns mechanisms in the context of relational contracting (quantity flexibility and buy-back contracts). Industry studies motivate the presented model.