Jacek Blazewicz; Klaus H. Ecker; Erwin Pesch; Günter Schmidt; Jan Weglarz Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. KG (2007) Kovakantinen kirja
Jacek Blazewicz; Klaus H. Ecker; Erwin Pesch; Günter Schmidt; Jan Weglarz Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. KG (2001) Kovakantinen kirja
Jacek Blazewicz; Klaus H. Ecker; Erwin Pesch; Günter Schmidt; Jan Weglarz Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. KG (2014) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Jacek Blazewicz; Klaus H. Ecker; Erwin Pesch; Günter Schmidt; Malgorzata Sterna; Jan Weglarz Springer International Publishing AG (2019) Kovakantinen kirja
Rainer Schmidt; Elisabeth Höpker-Herberg; Horst Gronemeyer; Klaus Hurlebusch; Rose-Maria Hurlebusch; Friedrich G Klopstock De Gruyter (2002) Kovakantinen kirja
Thomas Gutmann; Klaus A. Schneewind; Ulrich Schroth; Volker H. Schmidt; Antonellus Elsässer; Walter Land; Günt Hillebrand Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. KG (2002) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Ulrich C.H. Blum; Alexander Karmann; Marco Lehmann-Waffenschmidt; Marcel Thum; Klaus Wälde; Bernhard W. Wieland; Wiesmeth Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. KG (2003) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Uwe Petzschler; Klaus Weber; Matthias Quendt; Günter Rank; Ekkehard Rehbein; Werner Schmidt; Elvira Schmöger; H Schmöger Klett Ernst /Schulbuch (1997) Kovakantinen kirja
Springer Sivumäärä: 312 sivua Asu: Pehmeäkantinen kirja Painos: 2 Julkaisuvuosi: 2011, 13.12.2011 (lisätietoa) Kieli: Englanti
Let us start with the description of the purpose of this book. First we should explain how we understand its tide. In general, scheduling problems can be understood very broadly as the problems of the allocation of resources over time to perform a set of tasks. By resources we understand arbitrary means tasks compete for. They can be of a very different nature, e.g. manpower, money, processors (machines), energy, tools. Also tasks can have a variety of interpretations starting from machining parts in manu facturing systems up to processing information in computer systems. The same is true for task characteristics, e. g. ready times, due dates, relative urgency weights, functions describing task processing in relation to allotted resources. Moreover, a structure of a set of tasks, reflecting precedence constraints among them, can be defined in different ways. In addition, different criteria which measure the quality of the performance of a set of tasks can be taken into account.