Paolo Boggiatto (ed.); Elena Cordero (ed.); Maurice de Gosson (ed.); Hans G. Feichtinger (ed.); Fabio Nicola (ed.); Oliaro Birkhäuser (2019) Kovakantinen kirja
Paolo Boggiatto (ed.); Tommaso Bruno (ed.); Elena Cordero (ed.); Hans G. Feichtinger (ed.); Fabio Nicola (ed.); Ale Oliaro Birkhäuser (2021) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Paolo Boggiatto (ed.); Tommaso Bruno (ed.); Elena Cordero (ed.); Hans G. Feichtinger (ed.); Fabio Nicola (ed.); Ale Oliaro Birkhäuser (2020) Kovakantinen kirja
In his paper Theory of Communication [Gab46], D. Gabor proposed the use of a family of functions obtained from one Gaussian by time-and frequency shifts. Each of these is well concentrated in time and frequency; together they are meant to constitute a complete collection of building blocks into which more complicated time-depending functions can be decomposed. The application to communication proposed by Gabor was to send the coeffi cients of the decomposition into this family of a signal, rather than the signal itself. This remained a proposal-as far as I know there were no seri ous attempts to implement it for communication purposes in practice, and in fact, at the critical time-frequency density proposed originally, there is a mathematical obstruction; as was understood later, the family of shifted and modulated Gaussians spans the space of square integrable functions [BBGK71, Per71] (it even has one function to spare [BGZ75] . . . ) but it does not constitute what we now call a frame, leading to numerical insta bilities. The Balian-Low theorem (about which the reader can find more in some of the contributions in this book) and its extensions showed that a similar mishap occurs if the Gaussian is replaced by any other function that is "reasonably" smooth and localized. One is thus led naturally to considering a higher time-frequency density.
