David R. Williams; Robert G. Pople; David A. Showler; Lynn V. Dicks; Matthew F. Child; Erasmus K.H.J. zu Ermgassen; Suther Pelagic Publishing (2013) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
David R. Williams; Robert G. Pople; David A. Showler; Lynn V. Dicks; Matthew F. Child; Erasmus K.H.J. zu Ermgassen; Suther Pelagic Publishing (2013) Kovakantinen kirja
Lynn V. Dicks; Joscelyne E. Ashpole; Juliana Dänhardt; Katy James; Annelie M. Jönsson; Nicola Randall; David A. Showler Pelagic Publishing (2014) Kovakantinen kirja
Lynn V. Dicks; Joscelyne E. Ashpole; Juliana Dänhardt; Katy James; Annelie M. Jönsson; Nicola Randall; David A. Showler Pelagic Publishing (2014) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Pelagic Publishing Sivumäärä: 139 sivua Asu: Kovakantinen kirja Julkaisuvuosi: 2010, 01.01.2010 (lisätietoa) Kieli: Englanti
This book brings together scientific evidence and experience relevant to the practical conservation of wild bees. The authors worked with an international group of bee experts and conservationists to develop a global list of interventions that could benefit wild bees. They range from protecting natural habitat to controlling disease in commercial bumblebee colonies.
For each intervention, the book summarises studies captured by the Conservation Evidence project, where that intervention has been tested and its effects on bees quantified. The result is a thorough guide to what is known, or not known, about the effectiveness of bee conservation actions throughout the world. Bee Conservation is the first in a series of synopses that will cover different species groups and habitats, gradually building into a comprehensive summary of evidence on the effects of conservation interventions for all biodiversity throughout the world.
By making evidence accessible in this way, we hope to enable a change in the practice of conservation, so it can become more evidence-based. We also aim to highlight where there are gaps in knowledge.
Evidence from all around the world is included. If there appears to be a bias towards evidence from northern European or North American temperate environments, this reflects a current bias in the published research that is available to us. Conservation interventions are grouped primarily according to the relevant direct threats, as defined in the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN)’s Unified Classification of Direct Threats.