Committee on Basic Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences; Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Academies Press (1986) Kovakantinen kirja
Committee on Basic Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences; Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Academies Press (1988) Kovakantinen kirja
U.S. National Committee for the International Union of Psychological Science; Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and E National Academies Press (1990) Kovakantinen kirja
Committee on the Use of Volunteers in Schools; Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Division of Behaviora National Academies Press (1990) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Panel on the National Health Care Survey; Committee on National Statistics; Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Edu National Academies Press (1992) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Committee on the General Aptitude Test Battery; Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; Division of Behavior National Academies Press (1989) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Panel to Review the 2000 Census; Committee on National Statistics; Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Academies Press (2002) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Taylor & Francis Inc Sivumäärä: 166 sivua Asu: Pehmeäkantinen kirja Julkaisuvuosi: 2004, 31.08.2004 (lisätietoa) Kieli: Englanti
The social sciences in the United Kingdom are extensive, diverse and influential. At any one time, more than four million students study the social sciences in schools; and about a half million students study social science in universities. Total university income from the social sciences is at the four billion dollar level. Beyond that, many social scientists hold key positions in government, business, the media, civil service, and the voluntary sector. Great Expectations reviews the status of the social sciences in Great Britain at the beginning of the twenty-first century. While making clear that work opportunities for social scientists are substantial and that levels of intellectual performance equal that of graduates in physics, it provides a hard hitting, empirically grounded examination of a near crisis situation. The report goes far beyond what one conventionally expects in commissioned reports, arguing that the academic treadmill, driven by excessive accountability burdens, reduces the originality and quality of much academic research. The report emphasizes the ideological and parochial nature of much British social research. As a result, there is little applicability internationally, even less interdisciplinary work, and at times, an outright bias against the market economy as such. The Commission Report, is even handed, tough minded, and frank in discussing how it is that social science and new social and technical forces do not always mesh. The optimism exuded is measured, but genuine. Great Expectations offers policy recommendations and scientific goals that can be serviceable not only in the United Kingdom, but in all advanced societies in which social research is a central component of economic stability and development. It is a superb reference volume enriched by original analysis and pungent, clear-headed writing. Members of the commission include: Professor David Rhind, Vice Chancellor of the City University served as Chairman of the Commission. Members included Huw Beynon (Cardiff), Patricia Broadbent (Bristol), Vicki Bruce (Edinburgh), Barry Buzzan (LSE), Sue Duncan (Government Researcher), Stuart Etherington (National Council for Voluntary Organizations), Janet Lewis (Oxford), Denise Lievesley (UNESCO), Richard Portes (LBS), Marc Renaud (Research Council of Canada), Michael Tonry (Cambridge), and David Walker (The Guardian).