Institute of Medicine; National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicol National Academies Press (2011) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Ocean Studies Board; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicolog National Academies Press (2004) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Water Science and National Academies Press (2004) Kovakantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Polar Research Board; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicolo National Academies Press (2005) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Water Science and National Academies Press (2005) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on Fluor National Academies Press (2007) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on EPA's National Academies Press (2006) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on Envir National Academies Press (2007) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on State National Academies Press (2006) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on Human National Academies Press (2006) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on Sedim National Academies Press (2007) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on Toxic National Academies Press (2008) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on Estim National Academies Press (2008) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division On Earth And Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on Toxic National Academies Press (2005) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division On Earth And Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on Toxic National Academies Press (2008) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division On Earth And Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on Toxic National Academies Press (2008) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on the H National Academies Press (2009) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division On Earth And Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on Toxic National Academies Press (2008) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Committee on Conta National Academies Press (2009) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; Water Science and National Academies Press (2009) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
With the responsibility to ensure the safety of food, drugs, and other products, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) faces decisions that may have public-health consequences every day. Often the decisions must be made quickly and on the basis of incomplete information. FDA recognized that collecting and evaluating information on the risks posed by the regulated products in a systematic manner would aid in its decision-making process. Consequently, FDA and the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) asked the National Research Council (NRC) to develop a conceptual model that could evaluate products or product categories that FDA regulates and provide information on the potential health consequences associated with them.
A Risk-Characterization Framework for Decision-Making at the Food and Drug Administration describes the proposed risk-characterization framework that can be used to evaluate, compare, and communicate the public-health consequences of decisions concerning a wide variety of products. The framework presented in this report is intended to complement other risk-based approaches that are in use and under development at FDA, not replace them. It provides a common language for describing potential public-health consequences of decisions, is designed to have wide applicability among all FDA centers, and draws extensively on the well-vetted risk literature to define the relevant health dimensions for decision-making at the FDA. The report illustrates the use of that framework with several case studies, and provides conclusions and recommendations.
Table of Contents
Front Matter A Risk-Characterization Framework for Decision-Making at the Food and Drugh Administration Summary 1 Introduction 2 A Risk-Characterization Framework 3 Case Study of a Mitigation-Selection Decision 4 Case Study of a Targeting Decision 5 Case Study of a Strategic-Investment Decision 6 Case Study of a Targeting Decision That Spans Food and Drug Administration Centers 7 Conclusions and Future Directions Appendix A: Letter Report on the Development of a Model for Ranking FDA Product Categories on the Basis of Health Risks Appendix B: Statement of Task for the Committee on Ranking FDA Product Categories Based on Health Consequences, Phase II Appendix C: Scenarios Provided by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to the Committee on Ranking FDA Product Categories Based on Health Consequences, Phase II Appendix D: Biographic Information on the Committee on Ranking FDA Product Categories Based on Health Consequences, Phase II Appendix E: Factors Hypothesized as Important in Understanding Risk