Ron Elisha; Wesley Enoch; Deborah Mailman; Hannie Rayson; Keith Robinson; Tony Taylor; David Williamson; R Vandenbroucke Bloomsbury Publishing PLC (2001) Saatavuus: Tilaustuote Pehmeäkantinen kirja
M. W. Alford; New Hampshire Association; Free Will Baptists ( ?- ); John Butler; Enoch Mack; David Marks; Free Will Bapt Kniga po trebovaniyu Saatavuus: Tilaustuote
Sharon E. Straus; Douglas Badenoch; Scott Richardson; William Rosenberg; David L. Sackett John Wiley & Sons Inc (1998) Saatavuus: Loppuunmyyty Pehmeäkantinen kirja
In Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism David Enoch develops, argues for, and defends a strongly realist and objectivist view of ethics and normativity more broadly. This view--according to which there are perfectly objective, universal, moral and other normative truths that are not in any way reducible to other, natural truths--is familiar, but this book is the first in-detail development of the positive motivations for the view into reasonably precise arguments. And when the book turns defensive--defending Robust Realism against traditional objections--it mobilizes the original positive arguments for the view to help with fending off the objections. The main underlying motivation for Robust Realism developed in the book is that no other metaethical view can vindicate our taking morality seriously. The positive arguments developed here--the argument from the deliberative indispensability of normative truths, and the argument from the moral implications of metaethical objectivity (or its absence)--are thus arguments for Robust Realism that are sensitive to the underlying, pre-theoretical motivations for the view.