Carl Dahlström; Peter Esaiasson; Olle Folke; Mikael Gilljam; Sören Holmberg; Anna Högmark; Sverker C. Jagers; David Karlsson Santérus Förlag (2014) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
J C Perazzo; Francisco Eizayaga; Salvador Romay; Carlos E Brodersen; Alberto E Muñoz; Néstor R Lago Nova Science Publishers Inc (2016) Kovakantinen kirja
Francesco de Bello; Carlos P. Carmona; André T. C. Dias; Lars Götzenberger; Marco Moretti; Matty P. Berg Cambridge University Press (2021) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Vera Afrexio; Carlos A. C. Bastos; Ferreira, Paulo J. S. G. (University of Aveiro, Dept. of Electronics, Telecommunications an Taylor&Francis Inc (2023) Kovakantinen kirja
Donald Trump might have been the loudest and most powerful voice maligning the integrity of news media in a generation, but his unrelenting attacks draw from a stew of resentment, wariness, cynicism, and even hatred toward the press that has been simmering for years. At one time, journalism's centrality in reporting and interpreting important events was relatively unquestioned when a limited number of channels and voices produced a consensus-based news environment. The collapse of this environment has sparked a moment of reckoning within and outside journalism, particularly as professional news outlets struggle to remain solvent. Alternative voices compete for attention with and criticize the work and motivations of journalists, even as a growing number of journalists question their core norms and practices.
News After Trump considers these struggles over journalism to be about the very relevance of journalism as an institutional form of knowledge production. At the heart of this questioning is a struggle to define what truthful accounts look like and who ought to create them or determine them in a rapidly changing media culture. Through an extensive accounting of Trump's relationship with the press, and drawing on in-depth interviews with journalists and textual analysis of news events, editorials, social media, and trade-press discussions, the book rethinks the relevance of journalism by recognizing the limits of objectivity and the way in which journalism positions certain actors as authority figures while rendering the less socially powerful invisible or flawed. This ethos of detachment has staved off vital questions about how journalism connects to its audiences, how it creates enduring value in people's lives (or not), and how diversity needs to be understood jointly at the level of production, reporting, and audience in order to rebuild trust.