Board on Radioactive Waste Management; Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences; National Research Council; Division National Academies Press (1992) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Board on Radioactive Waste Management; Environment and Resources Commission on Geosciences; Division on Earth and Life Studies National Academies Press (1999) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources; Board on Radioactive Waste Management; Water Science and Technology Board National Academies Press (2000) Kovakantinen kirja
Committee on the Remediation of Buried and Tank Wastes; Board on Radioactive Waste Management; Enviro Commission on Geosciences National Academies Press (2000) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Committee on Cesium Processing Alternatives for High-Level Waste at the Savannah River Site; Board on Radioactive Waste Manageme National Academies Press (2000) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
Committee on the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant; Board on Radioactive Waste Management; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Nationa National Academies Press (2001) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Radioactive Waste Management; Committee on Principles an National Academies Press (2003) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
National Research Council; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Radioactive Waste Management; Committee on Improving the National Academies Press (2003) Pehmeäkantinen kirja
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) manages dozens of sites across the nation that focus on research, design, and production of nuclear weapons and nuclear reactors for defense applications. Radioactive wastes at these sites pose a national challenge, and DOE is considering how to most effectively clean them up. Some of the greatest projected risks, cleanup costs, and technical challenges come from processing and disposing transuranic and high-level radioactive waste. This report addresses how DOE should incorporate risk into decisions about whether the nation should use alternatives to deep geologic disposal for some of these wastes. It recommends using an exemption process involving risk assessment for determining how to dispose of problematic wastes. The report outlines criteria for risk assessment and key elements of a risk-informed approach. The report also describes the types of wastes that are candidates for alternative disposition paths, potential alternatives to deep geologic disposal for disposition of low-hazard waste, and whether these alternatives are compatible with current regulations.